4.5 Article

Strain Relaxation of Si/SiGe Heterostructures by a Geometric Monte Carlo Approach

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssr.202200398

Keywords

electron microscopy; quantum technology; silicon; thin films

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation mechanisms of MD networks in Si/SiGe heterostructures are investigated in this study. The results show that the ratio between the threading dislocation density (TDD) and the average length of MDs remains constant, and the fractal dimension of the MD network can be determined using the box-counting method.
Solid-state-based quantum technologies, such as electronic spin-qubits, constitute a leading approach to the realization of quantum computation. Electronic spin-qubits hosted in semiconductor heterostructures demand the highest crystalline quality, specifically with respect to the structure and formation of in-plane misfit dislocations (MDs). Here, the formation mechanisms of MD networks in such Si/SiGe heterostructures are investigated. For this purpose, strained Si layers on relaxed Si0.7Ge0.3 with thicknesses above the critical thickness are grown by molecular beam epitaxy to allow for the formation of MDs. MDs are mapped out by electron channeling contrast imaging and the experimental results are compared to MD networks calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. The simulations show that the ratio between the threading dislocation density (TDD) and the average length of MDs is a constant for a given set of parameters, here 2.9 for sufficiently large dislocation statistics and simultaneous extension of MDs. Further, the fractal dimension of the MD network determined by the box-counting method as an alternative quantity to characterize MD networks is introduced. This allows to infer the formation mechanism of MDs in real devices and hence the quantification of resulting average relaxation within the Si-quantum well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available