4.6 Article

Effect of CeO2/Er2O3 co-doping on spectroscopic properties of zinc fluoroborate glasses

Journal

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/aca3db

Keywords

cerium-doped glasses; optical energy gap; optical basicity; electronic polarizability; optical gain; Supplementary material for this article is available online

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a glass system was produced using the melt-quenching technique and the structural specifics were analyzed using FT-IR techniques. The presence of cerium ions was found to change the structural units in the glass composition. The optical properties of the glass co-doped with Er/Ce were calculated using the Judd-Ofelt theory, and data on optical gains, emission/absorption cross-sections, and optical intensity were provided. The concentration of 0.6 mol% showed the highest values for optical parameters compared to other concentrations.
The glass system 75B(2)O(3)-4.5ZnF(2)-0.5 Er2O3-(20-x) ZnO- x CeO2, x=(0. x. 1 mol.%) in this article was produced using the melt-quenching technique. Utilizing FT-IR techniques, the structural specifics of manufactured glasses are studied. The N4 and N3 fractions will be used to explore the transformation in the glass system that has been obtained. The BO3 and BO4 units coexisted in the glass composition, based on FT-IR spectra. Cerium ions appear to change trigonal BO3 units into tetrahedral BO4 units, according to preliminary FT-IR studies. The Judd-Ofelt theory is used to calculate the optical properties of the current glass that is co-doped with Er/Ce. Energy levels and line strengths of the Er3+ ion are evaluated. The current work additionally provides optical gains, emission/absorption cross-sections, and optical intensity data. The compound containing 0.6 mol% provided the greatest values for optical parameters like intensity parameters and optical gain compared to all other concentrations employed in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available