4.3 Article

Minimum spanning tree dynamic programming stereo-matching method based on superpixels

Journal

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD
Volume 38, Issue 181, Pages 63-80

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phor.12440

Keywords

colour Birchfield Tomasi (CBT); cost aggregation; dynamic programming; minimum spanning tree (MST); stereo-matching

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a dynamic programming stereo-matching method based on the minimum spanning tree (MST). By obtaining stable initial cost values, constructing pixel- and region-level MSTs, and re-deducing the cost-aggregation process using dynamic programming, a high-precision smooth disparity map is obtained. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in improving the accuracy of stereo-matching.
The minimum spanning tree (MST) stereo-matching method is an information-infiltration process. The difference in edge attributes of an MST can cause the edge-expansion phenomenon, which affects the matching accuracy. To accurately recover image-depth information, a dynamic-programming stereo-matching method based on the MST was proposed. First, the colour Birchfield Tomasi cost-calculation method based on image adaptive colour information was proposed to obtain stable initial cost values. Second, the image was segmented into superpixel regions using the simple linear iterative clustering algorithm. The pixel- and region-level MSTs were then constructed. Next, combined with the idea of dynamic programming, the MST cost-aggregation process was re-deduced. On this basis, the aggregate cost values of the two MSTs were obtained. Finally, the aggregate cost values were combined adaptively to acquire the high-precision smooth disparity map. The Middlebury 2014 dataset was used for the experiments. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method can effectively improve the accuracy of stereo-matching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available