4.4 Article

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Optimized Midazolam and Pentobarbital Dosing Used in Treatment Protocols of Refractory Status Epilepticus

Journal

PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 51-55

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003106

Keywords

epilepsy; midazolam; pentobarbital; pharmacokinetics; status epilepticus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In silico pharmacokinetic modeling of midazolam and pentobarbital suggests that standard treatment protocols for refractory status epilepticus result in higher steady-state serum concentrations. Not including bolus doses delays the achievement of steady-state concentration, while abrupt discontinuation reduces medication exposure. These models provide potential variables to optimize in future clinical studies.
OBJECTIVES:To model bolus dosing, infusion rate, and weaning rate on theoretical serum concentration of midazolam and pentobarbital used in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). DESIGN:One- and two-compartment in silico pharmacokinetic models of midazolam and pentobarbital. SETTING:Not applicable. SUBJECTS:Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS:We compared the model variables used in midazolam and pentobarbital protocols for standard RSE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Standard RSE treatment protocols result in steady-state serum concentrations that are 6.2-9.0-fold higher for the one-compartment model and 2.3-4.7-fold higher for the two-compartment model. In the model, not including bolus doses delays the achievement of serum steady-state concentration by 0.5 and 2.7 hours for midazolam and pentobarbital, respectively. Abrupt discontinuation of these medications reduces modeled medication exposure by 1.1 and 6.4 hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Our in silico pharmacokinetic modeling of standard midazolam and pentobarbital dosing protocols for RSE suggests potential variables to optimize in future clinical studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available