4.3 Article

Prevalence and genetic characterization of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in grazing horses in Xinjiang, northwestern China

Journal

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages 387-394

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07749-4

Keywords

Theileria equi; Babesia caballi; Prevalence; Genetic; Horses

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a high prevalence and genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in grazing horses in Xinjiang. The infection rates were 38.9% and 30.2%, respectively, and the co-infection rate was 19.4%. Multiple genotypes were identified based on gene sequencing. These results indicate the widespread distribution and abundant gene polymorphism of T. equi and B. caballi in grazing horses from Xinjiang.
Piroplasmosis is a disease that negatively affects equine health worldwide. Hence, 324 blood samples were collected from grazing horses in ten sites in Xinjiang and testing them for the presence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi by PCR of the EMA-1 gene and BC48 gene, respectively. Of the 324 blood samples, 161 (49.7%) were positive for equine piroplasms. The prevalence of T. equi was 38.9% (126/324), while that of B. caballi was 30.2% (98/324). The T. equi and B. caballi co-infection rate was 19.4% (63/324). From the 126 EMA-1 gene sequences and 98 BC48 gene sequences we obtained, 21 and 27 genotypes were identified, respectively. The EMA-1 sequences together with the GenBank reference sequences grouped into four clusters, with those from the present study forming two distinct clusters. In contrast, the BC48 sequences formed eight clusters with the GenBank reference sequences, while those obtained in the present study formed five distinct clusters. Our results highlight the widespread distribution and abundant gene polymorphism of T. equi and B. caballi in grazing horses from Xinjiang.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available