4.8 Article

Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex

Journal

CELL
Volume 162, Issue 3, Pages 648-661

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NINDS [1DP2OD006514-01, TR01 1R01NS076467-01, 1U01NS090449-01]
  2. Conte [1P50MH09427101]
  3. MURI Army Research Office [W911NF1210594, IIS-1447786]
  4. NSF [OIA-1125087, IIS-1110955]
  5. DARPA [HR0011-14-2-0004]
  6. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0051/2014]
  7. JHU Applied Physics Laboratory
  8. Research Program for Applied Neuroscience
  9. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  10. Nvidia
  11. Intel
  12. Google
  13. CRCNS [1R01EB016411]
  14. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1210594] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)
  15. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  16. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1447786] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  17. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  18. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1447344] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe automated technologies to probe the structure of neural tissue at nanometer resolution and use them to generate a saturated reconstruction of a sub-volume of mouse neocortex in which all cellular objects (axons, dendrites, and glia) and many sub-cellular components (synapses, synaptic vesicles, spines, spine apparati, postsynaptic densities, and mitochondria) are rendered and itemized in a database. We explore these data to study physical properties of brain tissue. For example, by tracing the trajectories of all excitatory axons and noting their juxtapositions, both synaptic and nonsynaptic, with every dendritic spine we refute the idea that physical proximity is sufficient to predict synaptic connectivity (the so-called Peters' rule). This online minable database provides general access to the intrinsic complexity of the neocortex and enables further data-driven inquiries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available