4.6 Article

Femtosecond laser written continuous-wave Nd3+:BaY2F8 waveguide laser at 1.3 μm

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.113199

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. T?rkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Ara-s?
  2. [118F058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this experiment, we demonstrate for the first time the robust operation of a Nd3(+:)BaY(2)F(8) waveguide laser at 1.3 μm without any parasitic lasing. The use of femtosecond laser writing allowed us to fabricate a depressed cladding waveguide with excellent power performance.
We experimentally demonstrate, for the first time to our knowledge, robust operation of a Nd3(+:)BaY(2)F(8) waveguide laser at 1.3 mu m without any parasitic lasing at any other wavelength. The best power performance was obtained with a depressed cladding waveguide, having a diameter of 70 mu m, which was fabricated by employing femtosecond laser writing. The propagation loss of the waveguide was measured as 0.33 dB/cm at the wavelength of 761 nm. The power performance of the waveguide laser was investigated for E//z and E//y pumping polarizations by using butt-coupled flat resonator mirrors. Higher power performance was obtained for E//z pumping, where the resonator with the 6.2% transmitting output coupler produced 157 mW of continuous-wave output power at 1318 nm with 882 mW of pump power at 800 nm. The measured power slope efficiency was 19% with respect to the incident pump power. By using a different set of cavity optics, 1050-nm lasing performance was also studied, where E//z pumping at 800 nm with the 12% transmitting output coupler yielded 307 mW of output power with 31% slope efficiency. Use of a host medium with relatively low refractive index around 1.5 was instrumental in reducing the facet reflectivity and eliminating the possibility of parasitic lasing at 1.05 mu m during 1.3-mu m lasing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available