4.8 Article

Widespread Macromolecular Interaction Perturbations in Human Genetic Disorders

Journal

CELL
Volume 161, Issue 3, Pages 647-660

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHGRI [P50HG004233, RC4HG006066, R01HG001715]
  2. NIGMS [GM082971]
  3. NSF [CCF-1219007]
  4. NSERC [RGPIN-2014-03892]
  5. Krembil Foundation
  6. Canada Excellence Research Chair
  7. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence Award
  8. Pew Latin American Fellowship
  9. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship
  10. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  11. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1219007] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How disease-associated mutations impair protein activities in the context of biological networks remains mostly undetermined. Although a few renowned alleles are well characterized, functional information is missing for over 100,000 disease-associated variants. Here we functionally profile several thousand missense mutations across a spectrum of Mendelian disorders using various interaction assays. The majority of disease-associated alleles exhibit wild-type chaperone binding profiles, suggesting they preserve protein folding or stability. While common variants from healthy individuals rarely affect interactions, two-thirds of disease-associated alleles perturb protein-protein interactions, with half corresponding to edgetic alleles affecting only a subset of interactions while leaving most other interactions unperturbed. With transcription factors, many alleles that leave protein-protein interactions intact affect DNA binding. Different mutations in the same gene leading to different interaction profiles often result in distinct disease phenotypes. Thus disease-associated alleles that perturb distinct protein activities rather than grossly affecting folding and stability are relatively widespread.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available