4.7 Article

Bi-objective optimization of a stochastic resilient vaccine distribution network in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102725

Keywords

Vaccine distribution network; Bi-objective mathematical optimization model; Disruption; Uncertainty; Robust-stochastic optimization; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops an approach to optimize the design of a vaccine distribution network with the objective of minimizing the total expected number of deaths and distribution cost. The study finds that current vaccination strategies are not optimal and the prioritization and equity of vaccine distribution depend on factors beyond health policymakers' considerations.
This paper develops an approach to optimize a vaccine distribution network design through a mixed-integer nonlinear programming model with two objectives: minimizing the total expected number of deaths among the population and minimizing the total distribution cost of the vaccination campaign. Additionally, we assume that a set of input parameters (e.g., death rate, social contacts, vaccine supply, etc.) is uncertain, and the distribution network is exposed to disruptions. We then investigate the resilience of the distribution network through a scenario-based robust-stochastic optimization approach. The proposed model is linearized and finally validated through a real case study of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France. We show that the current vaccination strategies are not optimal, and vaccination prioritization among the population and the equity of vaccine distribution depend on other factors than those conceived by health policymakers. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a vaccination strategy mixing the population prioritization and the quarantine restrictions leads to an 8.5% decrease in the total number of deaths. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available