4.7 Article

Partially rotating grid method for self-propulsion calculations with a double body ship model

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 266, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113105

Keywords

Partially rotating grid method; Self-propulsion; Model-scale; Full-scale; Dynamic overset grid; Propulsion factors

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund [KK.01.2.2.03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a partially rotating grid method for predicting self-propulsion characteristics of a ship. The method combines a temporal-domain rotating propeller approach with a non-inertial equation system to reduce computation time. The method is verified and validated through numerical simulations for a container ship, and the results are analyzed in terms of flow characteristics and ship-propeller interaction.
In this paper, partially rotating grid method for predicting self-propulsion characteristics using a double body ship model approach is presented. Partially rotating grid method combines a full-discretized temporal-domain rotating propeller approach with locally introduced non-inertial equation system to reduce overall computation time. Verification and validation of the method are performed in this paper. Numerical self-propulsion simulations are conducted for a single-screw KRISO container ship both in model and full-scale. Obtained results are analyzed in terms of integral (propulsion factors) and local (velocity field) flow characteristics with a focus on ship-propeller interaction and scale effects. To better understand propeller performance and ship-propeller interaction effects, variation of a single blade KT, KQ, and KT/KQ values during one period of rotation are analyzed. The introduced partially rotating grid method proved to accurately predict the integral and local flow characteristics while reducing overall computation time, at cost of reduced accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available