4.4 Review

Enhanced recovery after gynecological surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 30-43

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13000

Keywords

enhanced recovery after surgery; gynecological surgery; length of stay; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol has a positive effect on perioperative outcomes for women undergoing gynecologic surgery, including reduced length of stay, time to first flatus and first defecation, complications, and readmission rates. However, there is heterogeneity between studies, and more research is needed to draw reliable conclusions on the favorability of enhanced recovery after surgery.
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach designed to improve perioperative outcomes for patients. This meta-analysis aimed to identify and elaborate on the efficacy of this protocol in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from inception to December 2021. A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There was a significant reduction in the length of stay, the time to first flatus and first defecation, complications, and readmission rates in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery when compared to routine care. The rate of discharge on the first postoperative day significantly increased in patients from the enhanced recovery group. There was no significant difference in the surgery time and blood loss. In conclusion, the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol might have a positive effect on patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. However, there is still heterogeneity between the included studies, and we need more research to draw reliable conclusions that enhanced recovery after surgery is favorable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available