4.6 Article

Faster randomized block sparse Kaczmarz by averaging

Journal

NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-022-01473-x

Keywords

Randomized Kaczmarz; Sparse solutions; Parallel methods

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. ITN-ETN project TraDE-OPT -
  3. European Union [861137]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [861137] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a parallel (mini batch) version of the sparse Kaczmarz method, which computes solutions by averaging Kaczmarz steps. It is proven to have faster convergence compared to the standard method when parallel computations are utilized. Additionally, it can be viewed as a variant of other algorithms and has advantages such as estimating inconsistent systems and limiting convergence errors.
The standard randomized sparse Kaczmarz (RSK) method is an algorithm to compute sparse solutions of linear systems of equations and uses sequential updates, and thus, does not take advantage of parallel computations. In this work, we introduce a parallel (mini batch) version of RSK based on averaging several Kaczmarz steps. Naturally, this method allows for parallelization and we show that it can also leverage large overrelaxation. We prove linear expected convergence and show that, given that parallel computations can be exploited, the method provably provides faster convergence than the standard method. This method can also be viewed as a variant of the linearized Bregman algorithm, a randomized dual block coordinate descent update, a stochastic mirror descent update, or a relaxed version of RSK and we recover the standard RSK method when the batch size is equal to one. We also provide estimates for inconsistent systems and show that the iterates converges to an error in the order of the noise level. Finally, numerical examples illustrate the benefits of the new algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available