4.8 Article

Two modes of Cue2-mediated mRNA cleavage with distinct substrate recognition initiate no-go decay

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 253-270

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1172

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome collisions trigger the ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) and lead to the degradation of mRNA called no-go decay (NGD) through endonucleolytic cleavage. In yeast, NGD can occur in two modes, either coupled to RQC (NGD(RQC+)) or uncoupled from RQC (NGD(RQC-)), depending on the mechanism of substrate recognition by Cue2 endonuclease. The study found that the ubiquitin binding activity of Cue2 is necessary for NGD(RQC-) but not for NGD(RQC+), and it involves the first two N-terminal Cue domains of Cue2. Additionally, Trp122 of Cue2 plays a crucial role in NGD(RQC+), while Mbf1 prevents ribosomal frameshifting induced by rare codon staller.
Ribosome collisions are recognized by E3 ubiquitin ligase Hel2/ZNF598, leading to RQC (ribosome-associated quality control) and to endonucleolytic cleavage and degradation of the mRNA termed NGD (no-go decay). NGD in yeast requires the Cue2 endonuclease and occurs in two modes, either coupled to RQC (NGD(RQC+)) or RQC uncoupled (NGD(RQC-)). This is mediated by an unknown mechanism of substrate recognition by Cue2. Here, we show that the ubiquitin binding activity of Cue2 is required for NGD(RQC-) but not for NGD(RQC+), and that it involves the first two N-terminal Cue domains. In contrast, Trp122 of Cue2 is crucial for NGD(RQC+). Moreover, Mbf1 is required for quality controls by preventing +1 ribosome frameshifting induced by a rare codon staller. We propose that in Cue2-dependent cleavage upstream of the collided ribosomes (NGD(RQC-)), polyubiquitination of eS7 is recognized by two N-terminal Cue domains of Cue2. In contrast, for the cleavage within collided ribosomes (NGD(RQC+)), the UBA domain, Trp122 and the interaction between Mbf1 and uS3 are critical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available