4.6 Article

Comparison of neutron energy spectrum unfolding methods and evaluation of rationality criteria

Journal

NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-022-01139-2

Keywords

Neutron spectrum; ?H-*(10); Nuclear power plant; Evaluation criteria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neutron energy spectrum was measured and interpreted using different methods, and the results were consistent and in good agreement with direct measurements. The experimental findings indicate that neutron spectrum unfolding methods can provide more accurate neutron dose values by overcoming the issues with dosimeter response functions.
The neutron energy spectrum was measured using a Bonner sphere spectrometer at six locations inside the containment vessel of a nuclear reactor at the Qinshan nuclear power plant. The structures of the neutron spectra obtained by the maximum entropy, iteration, and genetic algorithm methods were consistent with one another and could be interpreted as the spectral superposition of different energy regions. The characteristic parameters of the neutron spectrum, including the fluence rate, average energy, and neutron ambient dose equivalent rate ?H-& lowast;(10), were in good agreement among the three methods. In addition, an LB6411 neutron ambient dose equivalent meter was employed to obtain the ?H-& lowast;(10) directly for comparison. These findings indicate that neutron spectrum unfolding methods can be used to overcome the problems associated with the response functions of dosimeters to provide more accurate ?H-& lowast;(10) values. In this study, the following three evaluation criteria were systematically addressed to ensure the accuracy of the unfolded spectra: count rates of the inverse solutions, neutron spectrum structures, and comparison of key parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available