4.8 Article

Intact-Brain Analyses Reveal Distinct Information Carried by SNc Dopamine Subcircuits

Journal

CELL
Volume 162, Issue 3, Pages 635-647

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NRSA [1F32MH105053-01, 1F31MH105151-01]
  2. Hughes Collaborative Innovation Award (HCIA)
  3. NIMH Silvio Conte Center at Stanford [P50 MH086403]
  4. Simons Foundation
  5. Gatsby Foundation
  6. Wiegers Family Fund
  7. Nancy and James Grosfeld Foundation
  8. H. L. Snyder Medical Foundation
  9. Samuel and Betsy Reeves Fund
  10. Vincent VC Woo Fund
  11. Albert Yu Foundation
  12. Mary Bechman Foundation
  13. DARPA Neuro-FAST program
  14. NIMH
  15. NIDA
  16. NSF
  17. Direct For Biological Sciences
  18. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1247950] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent progress in understanding the diversity of midbrain dopamine neurons has highlighted the importance-and the challenges-of defining mammalian neuronal cell types. Although neurons may be best categorized using inclusive criteria spanning biophysical properties, wiring of inputs, wiring of outputs, and activity during behavior, linking all of these measurements to cell types within the intact brains of living mammals has been difficult. Here, using an array of intact-brain circuit interrogation tools, including CLARITY, COLM, optogenetics, viral tracing, and fiber photometry, we explore the diversity of dopamine neurons within the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). We identify two parallel nigrostriatal dopamine neuron subpopulations differing in biophysical properties, input wiring, output wiring to dorsomedial striatum (DMS) versus dorsolateral striatum (DLS), and natural activity patterns during free behavior. Our results reveal independently operating nigrostriatal information streams, with implications for understanding the logic of dopaminergic feedback circuits and the diversity of mammalian neuronal cell types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available