4.6 Review

Linking resource- and disturbance-based models to explain tree-grass coexistence in savannas

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 237, Issue 6, Pages 1966-1979

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18648

Keywords

competitive exclusion; demographic bottlenecks; ecohydrology; functional rooting depth; niche partitioning; tree-grass coexistence; two-layer model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Savannas, which cover a significant portion of the Earth's land surface, are characterized by the persistent coexistence of C-3 trees and C-4 grasses. However, the mechanisms explaining this coexistence are still debated. Existing quantitative models have contrasting assumptions about the responsible mechanisms. This study shows that a single model cannot fully explain the coexistence, but combining elements from different models can provide a synthesis that incorporates both Walter's two-layer model and demographic bottlenecks. Functional rooting separation is proposed as a necessary factor for coexistence, supported by empirical evidence and the grasses' advantage in soil moisture acquisition.
Savannas cover a significant fraction of the Earth's land surface. In these ecosystems, C-3 trees and C-4 grasses coexist persistently, but the mechanisms explaining coexistence remain subject to debate. Different quantitative models have been proposed to explain coexistence, but these models make widely contrasting assumptions about which mechanisms are responsible for savanna persistence. Here, we show that no single existing model fully captures all key elements required to explain tree-grass coexistence across savanna rainfall gradients, but many models make important contributions. We show that recent empirical work allows us to combine many existing elements with new ideas to arrive at a synthesis that combines elements of two dominant frameworks: Walter's two-layer model and demographic bottlenecks. We propose that functional rooting separation is necessary for coexistence and is the crux of the coexistence problem. It is both well-supported empirically and necessary for tree persistence, given the comprehensive grass superiority for soil moisture acquisition. We argue that eventual tree dominance through shading is precluded by ecohydrological constraints in dry savannas and by fire and herbivores in wet savannas. Strong asymmetric grass-tree competition for soil moisture limits tree growth, exposing trees to persistent demographic bottlenecks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available