4.6 Article

Work fluctuations for diffusion dynamics submitted to stochastic return

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aca25e

Keywords

stochastic resetting; stochastic thermodynamics; fluctuations

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [PID2021-122588NB-I00]
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe
  3. DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [163436311 - SFB 910]
  4. European Union [101065902]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [101065902] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a general framework for determining the work distribution for returning a system using a confining potential with its minimum at the restart location. The average over resetting pathways provides a robust method for accessing statistical information of observables from resetting systems. The theory is illustrated using specific computations and validated through numerical simulations, revealing non-trivial behaviors of work fluctuations.
Returning a system to a desired state under a force field involves a thermodynamic cost, i.e. work. This cost fluctuates for a small-scale system from one experimental realization to another. We introduce a general framework to determine the work distribution for returning a system facilitated by a confining potential with its minimum at the restart location. The general strategy, based on average over resetting pathways, constitutes a robust method to gain access to the statistical information of observables from resetting systems. We exploit paradigmatic setups, where explicit computations are attainable, to illustrate the theory. Numerical simulations validate our theoretical predictions. For some of these examples, a non-trivial behavior of the work fluctuations opens a door to optimization problems. Specifically, work fluctuations can be minimized by an appropriate tuning of the return rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available