4.4 Article

Neonatal Isoflurane Exposure in Rats Impairs Short-Term Memory, Cell Viability, and Glutamate Uptake in Slices of the Frontal Cerebral Cortex, But Not the Hippocampus, in Adulthood

Journal

NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1924-1936

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12640-022-00607-2

Keywords

Isoflurane; Neonatal; Glutamatergic transmission; Frontal cortex; Memory

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian funding agency: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) -Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT for Excitotoxicity and Neuroprotection)
  2. Brazilian funding agency: Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [CAPES/PVE 052/2012, CAPES-FCT 2014]
  3. Brazilian funding agency: Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC)-Programa de Apoio aos Nucleos de Excelencia (PRONEX -Project NENASC)
  4. Portuguese funding agency: Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [2015-UID/NEU/04539/2013]
  5. Portuguese funding agency: COMPETE-FEDER [POCI01-0145-FEDER-007400]
  6. CNPq
  7. Portuguese funding agency: Centro 2020 Regional Operational Programmes [CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000012, CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of neonatal exposure to isoflurane on the developing rat brain. The findings showed that a single exposure to isoflurane had different effects during infancy and adulthood. Behavioral analysis in adult rats revealed impaired short-term memory following neonatal isoflurane exposure, but no effects on anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity.
Neonatal exposure to general anesthetics has been associated with neurotoxicity and morphologic changes in the developing brain. Isoflurane is a volatile anesthetic widely used in pediatric patients to induce general anesthesia, analgesia, and perioperative sedation. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a single neonatal isoflurane (3% in oxygen, 2 h) exposure in rats at postnatal day (PND) 7, in short-term (24 h - PND8) and long-term (adulthood) protocols. In PND8, ex vivo analysis of hippocampal and frontal cortex slices evaluated cell viability and susceptibility to in vitro glutamate challenge. In adult rats, behavioral parameters related to anxiety-like behavior, short-term memory, and locomotor activity (PND60-62) and ex vivo analysis of cell viability, membrane permeability, glutamate uptake, and susceptibility to in vitro glutamate challenge in hippocampal and cortical slices from PND65. A single isoflurane (3%, 2 h) exposure at PND7 did not acutely alter cell viability in cortical and hippocampal slices of infant rats (PND8) per se and did not alter slice susceptibility to in vitro glutamate challenge. In rat's adulthood, behavioral analysis revealed that the neonatal isoflurane exposure did not alter anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity (open field and rotarod tests). However, isoflurane exposure impaired short-term memory evaluated in the novel object recognition task. Ex vivo analysis of brain slices showed isoflurane neonatal exposure selectively decreased cell viability and glutamate uptake in cortical slices, but it did not alter hippocampal slice viability or glutamate uptake (PND65). Isoflurane exposure did not alter in vitro glutamate-induced neurotoxicity to slices, and isoflurane exposure caused no significant long-term damage to cell membranes in hippocampal or cortical slices. These findings indicate that a single neonatal isoflurane exposure did not promote acute damage; however, it reduced cortical, but not hippocampal, slice viability and glutamate uptake in the adulthood. Additionally, behavioral analysis showed neonatal isoflurane exposure induces short-term recognition memory impairment, consolidating that neonatal exposure to volatile anesthetics may lead to behavioral impairment in the adulthood, although it may damage brain regions differentially.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available