4.3 Article

Cortical oscillatory changes during thermal grill illusion

Journal

NEUROREPORT
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 205-208

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001874

Keywords

cortical oscillations; electroencephalography; thermal grill illusion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study recorded EEG activity during the experience of thermal grill illusion (TGI) and found that theta and alpha bands in the insular cortex and parietal operculum clusters were significantly more desynchronized under the TGI condition compared to the warm condition. Furthermore, theta, alpha, and beta bands in the frontal cluster showed significant desynchronization under the TGI condition. These EEG oscillations in specific brain areas may serve as useful markers of central neuropathic pain.
ObjectiveThe thermal grill illusion (TGI) can cause a burning pain sensation when the skin is subjected to simultaneously harmless hot and cold stimuli, and the pain is reported to be similar to central neuropathic pain. Although electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used in pain research, no reports have revealed EEG activity during TGI. MethodsOne healthy subject was enrolled, and EEG activity was recorded during the experience of the TGI and a warm sensation. Independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to preprocessed EEG data, which was divided into several clusters. ResultsTheta and alpha bands in the insular cortex and parietal operculum clusters were significantly more desynchronized under the TGI condition than under the warm condition (P < 0.05). Additionally, theta, alpha and beta bands in the frontal (middle and inferior frontal gyrus) cluster showed significantly more desynchronization under the TGI condition than under the warm condition (P < 0.05). ConclusionEEG oscillations in these brain areas could be useful markers of central neuropathic pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available