4.0 Article

Gait is not Affected by Hemispherotomy-Case Report from Two Children

Journal

NEUROPEDIATRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2021-0202

Keywords

gait pattern; hemispherotomy; bilateral projection; cortico-spinal tract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hemispherotomy is considered as a treatment option for children with therapy refractory epilepsy. The effect of hemispherotomy on gait pattern has been analyzed qualitatively but lacks quantitative data. In this study, two children with therapy refractory epilepsy underwent gait analysis before and after hemispherotomy, with one showing no changes and the other showing differences in gait pattern by three-dimensional analysis.
In children with therapy refractory epilepsy, the functional disconnection of one hemisphere (hemispherotomy) may be considered as a treatment option. The visual field defects and hand function effects associated with the procedure have been extensively studied. However, the effect of the hemispherotomy on gait pattern has thus far only been analyzed qualitatively, and there is limited quantitative data. At the Children's Hospital, we regularly perform standardized quantitative gait analysis studies and care for children with complex epilepsies. During the standard routine of care for two children with structural therapy refractory epilepsy, gait analysis was performed prior to and after hemispherotomy. Both patients had prenatal ischemic brain lesions, had developed severe epilepsy during the first 3 years of life, and were treated with the hemispherotomy at about 7 years of age. Interestingly, one patient did not show any changes in gait pattern, while for the other patient, differences could be observed by means of three-dimensional gait analysis. However, greater deviations to controls postoperatively may also be related to day-to-day variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available