4.6 Article

Solvent and Heavy-Atom Effects on the O2(X3Σg-) → O2(b1Σg+) Absorption Transition

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 120, Issue 42, Pages 8285-8296

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b08035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of 16 liquid solvents on both the spectrum and molar absorption coefficient of the X-3 Sigma(-)(g) -> b(1)Sigma(+)(g) transition in molecular oxygen has been examined. The ability to monitor this weak transition using air or oxygen saturated samples at atmospheric pressure was facilitated by the rapid and efficient O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) -> O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) transition, which allowed the use of O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) phosphorescence as a sensitive probe of O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) production. The results of these O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) phosphorescence experiments are consistent with the results of independent experiments in which the O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) thus produced was trapped via a chemical reaction. The data recorded were used to calculate rate constants for the O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) -> O-2(X-3 Sigma(-)(g)) radiative transition, a parameter that is otherwise difficult to directly obtain from such a wide range of solvents using O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) -> O-2(X-3 Sigma(-)(g)) phosphorescence. The data show that the response of the O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) -> O-2(X-3 Sigma(-)(g)) radiative transition to solvent is not the same as that of the O-2(b(1)Sigma(+)(g)) -> O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) and O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) -> O-2(X-3 Sigma(-)(g)) radiative transitions, both of which have been extensively examined over the years. However, our data are consistent with a theoretical model proposed by Minaev for the effect of solvent on radiative transitions in oxygen and, as such, arguably provide one of the final chapters in describing a system that has challenged the scientific community for years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available