4.7 Article

Testing for Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Disclosing Results Across the Disease Continuum

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 21, Pages 1010-1019

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206891

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is characterized by three pathologic processes: beta-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau, and neurodegeneration. Advances in measuring biomarkers of these processes have led to a growing interest in using AD biomarker tests in care and research. Therefore, a 5-step approach is proposed, including determining the appropriateness of testing, providing pretest education and consent, administering the test, disclosing the results, and follow-up for well-being.
Three pathologic processes are characteristic of Alzheimer disease (AD): beta-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau, and neurodegeneration. Our understanding of AD is undergoing a transformation due to our ability to measure biomarkers of these processes across different stages of cognitive impairment. There is growing interest in using AD biomarker tests in care and research and, with this, a growing need for guidance on how to return these sensitive results to patients and participants. Here, we propose a 5-step approach informed by clinical and research experience designing and implementing AD biomarker disclosure processes, extant evidence describing how individuals react to AD biomarker information, ethics, law, and the literature on breaking bad news. The clinician should (1) determine the appropriateness of AD biomarker testing and return of results for the particular patient or research participant. If testing is appropriate, the next steps are to (2) provide pretest education and seek consent for testing from the individual and their support person, (3) administer testing, (4) return the results to the individual and their support person, and (5) follow-up to promote the recipient's well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available