4.6 Article

Evaluating deep learning predictions for COVID-19 from X-ray images using leave-one-out predictive densities

Journal

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
Volume 35, Issue 13, Pages 9819-9830

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08219-3

Keywords

Bayesian learning; Markov chain Monte Carlo; COVID X-ray

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early detection of COVID-19 is crucial for controlling the pandemic. Deep learning techniques have shown high accuracy in automatic COVID-19 detection, but lack of external evaluation and data scarcity pose challenges. This paper proposes SGLD-based approach to consider model uncertainty and evaluates it using convergence properties and predictive densities, achieving reduced overconfidence and retained predictive accuracy.
Early detection of the COVID-19 virus is an important task for controlling the spread of the pandemic. Imaging techniques such as chest X-ray are relatively inexpensive and accessible, but its interpretation requires expert knowledge to evaluate the disease severity. Several approaches for automatic COVID-19 detection using deep learning techniques have been proposed. While most approaches show high accuracy on the COVID-19 detection task, there is not enough evidence on external evaluation for this technique. Furthermore, data scarcity and sampling biases make difficult to properly evaluate model predictions. In this paper, we propose stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) to take into account the model uncertainty. Four different deep learning architectures are trained using SGLD and compared to their baselines using stochastic gradient descent. The model uncertainties are also evaluated according to their convergence properties and the leave-one-out predictive densities. The proposed approach is able to reduce overconfidence of the baseline estimators while also retaining predictive accuracy for the best-performing cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available