4.5 Article

CTCF blocks antisense transcription initiation at divergent promoters

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 1136-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-022-00855-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK58044, R24 DK106766, T32 HL07439, R01GM121613, U01 DK127405]
  2. EMBO long-term fellowship [ALTF 540-2018]
  3. American Heart Association [836074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the transcription factor CTCF specifically suppresses upstream antisense transcription at divergent gene promoters, shedding light on the regulation of antisense transcription and its coordination with sense transcription.
Transcription at most promoters is divergent, initiating at closely spaced oppositely oriented core promoters to produce sense transcripts along with often unstable upstream antisense transcripts (uasTrx). How antisense transcription is regulated and to what extent it is coordinated with sense transcription is not well understood. Here, by combining acute degradation of the multi-functional transcription factor CTCF and nascent transcription measurements, we find that CTCF specifically suppresses antisense but not sense transcription at hundreds of divergent promoters. Primary transcript RNA-FISH shows that CTCF lowers burst fraction but not burst intensity of uasTrx and that co-bursting of sense and antisense transcripts is disfavored. Genome editing, chromatin conformation studies and high-resolution transcript mapping revealed that precisely positioned CTCF directly suppresses the initiation of uasTrx, in a manner independent of its architectural function. In sum, CTCF shapes the transcriptional landscape in part by suppressing upstream antisense transcription. Luan et al. find that CTCF shapes the transcriptional landscape in part by suppressing the initiation of upstream antisense transcription at hundreds of divergent gene promoters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available