4.5 Review

Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Oncology

BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants and prostate cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis

Tommy Nyberg et al.

Summary: BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants are associated with prostate cancer risk with varying relative risks reported. The heterogeneity in estimates may be influenced by factors such as age, family history, and study-level differences in ethnicity composition. Subgroup analyses suggest risks may be modified by age, ethnicity, and PV location within BRCA2 for future risk estimation studies.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2022)

Article Oncology

Cancer Risks Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

Shuai Li et al.

Summary: This study aims to provide precise age-specific risk estimates of cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers associated with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 for effective cancer risk management.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA repair gene defects (GALAHAD) a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

Matthew R. Smith et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the anti-tumor activity and safety of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers and DNA repair gene defects (DRDs) who had previously failed treatment with an androgen signaling inhibitor and a taxane. The results showed that niraparib was well-tolerated and demonstrated anti-tumor activity in these patients, particularly in those with BRCA alterations.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening

Michael S. Leapman et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the changes in PSA testing rates after the revisions in the USPSTF guideline on prostate cancer screening. It found that rates of PSA testing increased after the 2017 draft statement, especially among men aged 55 to 69 and 70 to 89 years.

JAMA ONCOLOGY (2022)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Intensification of Systemic Therapy in Addition to Definitive Local Treatment in Nonmetastatic Unfavourable Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pawel Rajwa et al.

Summary: Adding chemotherapy or an ARSI to ADT and primary local therapy improves oncologic outcomes in high-risk and/or unfavourable nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2022)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Germline testing and genetic counselling in prostate cancer

Jessica Russo et al.

Summary: In this review, the authors discuss the criteria and strategies for germline testing for prostate cancer, as well as the implications for precision medicine and genetic counseling. They highlight the importance of understanding personalized cancer risk management and syndrome-related cancer risk management for optimal care of patients and their families.

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

Yukihide Momozawa et al.

Summary: The results of this large-scale registry-based case-control study suggest that pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with the risk of 7 cancer types. These results indicate broader clinical relevance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.

JAMA ONCOLOGY (2022)

Review Oncology

Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tatsushi Kawada et al.

Summary: PSMA-PET-TB has favorable diagnostic accuracy for detecting csPCa, and the combination with MRI can further improve accuracy. Further research is needed to explore the clinical application of PSMA-PET.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2022)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Genomic Testing in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pragmatic Guide for Clinicians

Axel S. Merseburger et al.

Summary: Genomic testing is essential in identifying molecular alterations and guiding treatment decisions in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Various therapies are being developed to target these alterations, with potential for improved outcomes. Routine genomic testing is recommended to optimize patient management.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Systematic Literature Review of the Epidemiology of Advanced Prostate Cancer and Associated Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Alterations

N. Shore et al.

Summary: This study characterized the global epidemiology of different types of metastatic prostate cancer and assessed the prevalence and prognostic impact of homologous recombination repair gene alterations in advanced disease setting. The results indicated that there is limited real-world evidence on the prevalence of prostate cancer and HRRm beyond mCRPC, with BRCA2 being one of the most common genes associated with HRRm in mCRPC.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Oncology

Reimagining prostate cancer screening: the IMPACT of germline mutations

Giorgio Gandaglia et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2021)

Review Urology & Nephrology

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

Nicolas Mottet et al.

Summary: The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of localized prostate cancer summarize the most recent recommendations for clinical practice, including risk-adapted strategies, medical imaging utilization, biopsy techniques, patient classification, and treatment options. Recommendations include consideration of moderate hypofractionation for intermediate-risk patients and a combination of local treatment with long-term hormonal therapy for cN1 PCa patients.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Association of Negative Followup Biopsy and Reclassification during Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pawel Rajwa et al.

Summary: The study found that negative followup biopsy is significantly associated with a decreased risk of reclassification and upgrading in prostate cancer patients, particularly among those in Gleason Grade prognostic group 1. Incorporating negative followup biopsy results into current protocols can help tailor personalized active surveillance and improve decision-making accuracy.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study

David Eldred-Evans et al.

Summary: In this cohort study, MRI with a score of 4 or 5 as a positive test result detected more clinically significant prostate cancer cases compared to PSA testing alone at 3 ng/mL or higher, without increasing unnecessary biopsies or overdiagnosing clinically insignificant cancer. Ultrasonography did not show superior performance to PSA testing alone.

JAMA ONCOLOGY (2021)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Reliability of Serial Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Prostate Cancer Progression During Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pawel Rajwa et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the diagnostic estimates of serial prostate MRI for PCa progression during AS, suggesting that MRI alone is not accurate enough to reliably rule out or rule in prostate cancer progression. Other clinical factors and biomarkers are needed to tailor the intensity of follow-up biopsies.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Impact of Pathogenic Germline DNA Damage Repair alterations on Response to Intense Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Jacob E. Berchuck et al.

Summary: This study found that pathogenic gDDR alterations are common among men with intermediate-and high-risk localized prostate cancer. Patients with gDDR alterations exhibit similar response to intense neoadjuvant ADT in terms of exceptional pathologic response and rates of post-RP biochemical recurrence compared to patients without gDDR alterations.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

Review Oncology

Prostate cancer and PARP inhibitors: progress and challenges

Diego Teyssonneau et al.

Summary: Prostate cancer remains lethal at the metastatic castration-resistant stage, and the development of PARP inhibitors offers a new therapeutic option. Despite progress, there are still issues related to PARP inhibitors that need to be addressed.

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Urology & Nephrology

A Clinical Trial of Prophylactic Prostatectomy for BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Is Now the Time

Roderick Clark et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2021)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Prostate-specific Antigen Testing as Part of a Risk-Adapted Early Detection Strategy for Prostate Cancer: European Association of Urology Position and Recommendations for 2021

Hendrik Van Poppel et al.

Summary: The European Association of Urology in 2021 presented a risk-adapted strategy for early prostate cancer detection using PSA testing, risk calculators, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. This approach aims to reduce overdiagnosis/overtreatment and improve quality of life by diagnosing significant cancer early.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Tobias Nordstrom et al.

Summary: This study compared traditional screening methods for prostate cancer with a diagnostic strategy combining blood-based risk prediction and MRI-targeted biopsies. The use of the Stockholm3 test was found to be non-inferior to PSA for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, while also detecting a similar number of low-grade cancers. Additionally, the combination of Stockholm3 with MRI-targeted biopsies led to higher detection rates of significant cancers and lower rates of low-grade cancers compared to standard screening methods.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening

Martin Eklund et al.

Summary: In the context of organized prostate cancer screening, MRI with targeted and standard biopsy was shown to be noninferior to standard biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, while also resulting in less detection of clinically insignificant cancer.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2021)

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Barriers and facilitators of germline genetic evaluation for prostate cancer

Stacy Loeb et al.

Summary: Physician and organizational factors play a major role in the decision to conduct germline genetic evaluation for prostate cancer patients, with knowledge, care coordination, guideline perceptions, and cost concerns being key determinants. Efforts to expand physician education, improve genetics tools in practice, and enhance care coordination are crucial to promote guideline-concordant care.

PROSTATE (2021)

Review Oncology

Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Elio Mazzone et al.

Summary: This meta-analysis found that the PPV of mpMRI is highly dependent on disease prevalence, with main factors affecting PPV being PI-RADS version 2 scores and prior biopsy status. PPV for csPCa increased with higher PI-RADS scores and was influenced by cancer prevalence. Study design, TBx technique, and number of sampled cores did not affect PPV significantly.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2021)

Letter Oncology

Germline BRCA1 Mutation and Prostate Cancer: Be Careful on Causality

Alice Boileve et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Clinical Implications of Germline Testing in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

Stacy Loeb et al.

Summary: Guidelines recommend germline testing for men with metastatic prostate cancer, with varying criteria for testing in localized disease. Genetic testing for localized disease can reveal hereditary cancer risk and may impact future prostate cancer management. The uptake of germline evaluation is not optimal in some practice settings, indicating a need for optimization strategies.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Prostate Cancer Risks for Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: A Prospective Cohort Study

Tommy Nyberg et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening

H. Gilbert Welch et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

J. de Bono et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2020)

Editorial Material Oncology

Two Steps Forward and One Step Back for Precision in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Michael T. Schweizer et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Survival with Olaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Maha Hussain et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2020)

Review Oncology

BRCA Mutations in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic and Predictive Implications

Carlo Messina et al.

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY (2020)

Article Urology & Nephrology

A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Jonas Hugosson et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2019)

Meeting Abstract Oncology

Are prostate cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations safe for active surveillance?

Marc Dall'era et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)

Review Urology & Nephrology

The influence of BRCA2 mutation on localized prostate cancer

Renea A. Taylor et al.

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2019)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Joshua J. Fenton et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial

Richard M. Martin et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

V Kasivisvanathan et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)

Review Oncology

Prostate cancer radiation and urethral strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohannad A. Awad et al.

PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2018)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators

Ben Van Calster et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Past, Current, and Future Incidence Rates and Burden of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the United States

Scott P. Kelly et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer

Timothy J. Wilt et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

F. C. Hamdy et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

C. C. Pritchard et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)

Article Oncology

Cancer risks in Jewish male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Yael Laitman et al.

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2015)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer

Adam Abeshouse et al.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

J. Mateo et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2015)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Systematic Review of Complications of Prostate Biopsy

Stacy Loeb et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2013)

Article Oncology

Impact of Comorbidity on Survival Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

Peter C. Albertsen et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2011)

Article Oncology

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment After the Introduction of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: 1986-2005

H. Gilbert Welch et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2009)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial

Gerald L. Andriole et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2009)

Review Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability

K. Gudmundsdottir et al.

ONCOGENE (2006)