4.7 Review

Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 161-177

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00541-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, the authors discuss the latest developments in prime editing systems, highlighting improvements in editing efficiency and capabilities, as well as emerging applications in research and preclinical therapeutic studies. Prime editors offer versatility, specificity, and precision in making targeted DNA changes in living cells. The review summarizes prime editing strategies, addresses their limitations, discusses recent developments to overcome these limitations, and explores potential applications and future directions.
In this Review, Chen and Liu discuss the latest developments in prime editing systems, including improvements to their editing efficiency and capabilities, as well as diverse emerging applications in research and preclinical therapeutic studies. Programmable gene-editing tools have transformed the life sciences and have shown potential for the treatment of genetic disease. Among the CRISPR-Cas technologies that can currently make targeted DNA changes in mammalian cells, prime editors offer an unusual combination of versatility, specificity and precision. Prime editors do not require double-strand DNA breaks and can make virtually any substitution, small insertion and small deletion within the DNA of living cells. Prime editing minimally requires a programmable nickase fused to a polymerase enzyme, and an extended guide RNA that both specifies the target site and templates the desired genome edit. In this Review, we summarize prime editing strategies to generate programmed genomic changes, highlight their limitations and recent developments that circumvent some of these bottlenecks, and discuss applications and future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available