4.8 Article

Mechanical stress driven by rigidity sensing governs epithelial stability

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 132-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01826-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial cells are influenced by mechanical stress and abrasion, impacting their integrity. Culturing epithelial cells on two-dimensional hydrogels showed that soft substrates resulted in a loss of epithelial monolayer integrity through hole formation. This rupture was associated with cellular stretching and cell division events.
Epithelia act as barriers against environmental stresses. They are continuously exposed to various mechanical stress and abrasion, which impact epithelial integrity. The impact of the environment on epithelial integrity remains elusive. By culturing epithelial cells on two-dimensional hydrogels, we observe a loss of epithelial monolayer integrity on soft substrates through spontaneous hole formation. These monolayer ruptures are associated with local cellular stretching and cell-division events. Substrate stiffness triggers an unanticipated mechanical switch of epithelial monolayers from compressive stress on stiff substrates to highly tensile on soft, favouring hole formation. In agreement with an active nematic model, hole-opening events occur preferentially near spontaneous half-integer topological defects, which underpin large isotropic stress fluctuations triggering stochastic mechanical failure. Our results thus show that substrate stiffness provides feedback on the mechanical state of epithelial monolayers with potential application towards a mechanistic understanding of compromised epithelial integrity during normal and pathological human ontogenesis. On soft substrates, epithelial tissues are under high tension and form holes that spontaneously heal. Thus, mechanical stress directly impacts the integrity of epithelia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available