4.7 Article

Neocortical synaptic engrams for remote contextual memories

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 259-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01223-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The consolidation process of remote contextual fear memories in mice involves the strengthening of excitatory connections between prefrontal cortical (PFC) engram neurons that were active during learning and reactivated during remote memory recall. The extinction of remote memories weakens these synapses. The synapse-specific plasticity is dependent on CREB and requires sustained hippocampal signals, which can be conveyed to PFC by the retrosplenial cortex. The strong connection between PFC engram neurons and other PFC neurons recruited during remote memory recall is also observed.
While initial encoding of contextual memories involves the strengthening of hippocampal circuits, these memories progressively mature to stabilized forms in neocortex and become less hippocampus dependent. Although it has been proposed that long-term storage of contextual memories may involve enduring synaptic changes in neocortical circuits, synaptic substrates of remote contextual memories have been elusive. Here we demonstrate that the consolidation of remote contextual fear memories in mice correlated with progressive strengthening of excitatory connections between prefrontal cortical (PFC) engram neurons active during learning and reactivated during remote memory recall, whereas the extinction of remote memories weakened those synapses. This synapse-specific plasticity was CREB-dependent and required sustained hippocampal signals, which the retrosplenial cortex could convey to PFC. Moreover, PFC engram neurons were strongly connected to other PFC neurons recruited during remote memory recall. Our study suggests that progressive and synapse-specific strengthening of PFC circuits can contribute to long-term storage of contextual memories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available