4.8 Article

Fault strength and rupture process controlled by fault surface topography

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 94-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-01093-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The topographic heterogeneity of faults affects their strength and earthquake properties. Less heterogeneous faults are weaker and have a larger stress drop compared to more heterogeneous faults. Rupture along less heterogeneous faults tends to propagate at subshear speed while more heterogeneous faults accommodate a wider range of rupture speeds. These findings have implications for understanding natural faults and earthquakes.
Faults are rarely completely smooth, with topographic undulations coming from the distribution of asperities along the fault surface. Understanding the effects of fault surface topography on fault strength and earthquake source properties has been limited due to a lack of in situ observations in the field. Here we use simulated earthquake cycles on metre-scale laboratory faults to show the effects of the degree of fault topographic heterogeneity, especially on macroscopic peak strength represented by the shear force required to commence macroscopic failure. Our results demonstrate that the less heterogeneous fault is weaker, due to its lower macroscopic peak strength, and produces a larger stress drop on average than the more heterogeneous fault. Rupture along the less heterogeneous fault tends to propagate at subshear speed while the more heterogeneous fault accommodates a wider range of rupture speeds, including slow slip and supershear rupture. These results reveal how fault topographic heterogeneity affects macroscopic peak strength at rupture initiation and stress drop during rupture propagation, which has important implications for understanding natural faults and earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available