4.8 Article

Nanoscopic evaluation on mitochondrial ultrastructures by regulating reactive oxygen species productivity within terpyridyl Zn(ii) complexes with different alkyl chain lengths

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 350-355

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr04088c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
  3. [32171361]
  4. [21871003]
  5. [81621003]
  6. [ZYGD22009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mechanisms of two terpyridyl Zn(ii) complexes with different alkyl chain lengths in regulating ROS production, mitochondrial signaling, and ultrastructural variations. The results showed that both complexes could enter live cells and accumulate in mitochondria, and the complex with higher ROS productivity could downregulate the caspase signaling pathway.
Mitochondria targeting complexes are widely utilized as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy. However, the mechanisms by which they regulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production at the molecular level and their influence on intracellular mitochondrial signaling and ultrastructures remain rarely studied. Herein, we present two terpyridyl Zn(ii) complexes with different side alkyl chain lengths (Zn-2C and Zn-6C) that lead to low and high ROS productivities in vitro, respectively. Both complexes could enter live cells effectively with minimal dark toxicity and accumulate preferably in the mitochondria. We also demonstrated that Zn-6C, with more efficient ROS productivity, could significantly downregulate the caspase signaling pathway but showed no evident influence on mitochondrial membrane proteins. We also highlighted and compared the mitochondrial ultrastructural variations during such a process by stimulated emission depletion (STED) super-resolution nanoscopy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available