4.4 Article

An Investigation of Factored Regression Missing Data Methods for Multilevel Models with Cross-Level Interactions

Journal

MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 938-963

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2022.2147049

Keywords

Missing data; multiple imputation; factored regression; multilevel modeling; moderation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A growing body of literature has focused on missing data methods that factorize the joint distribution into a part representing the analysis model of interest and a part representing the distributions of the incomplete predictors. This study explores the utility of these methods for multilevel models with interactive effects, using Monte Carlo computer simulations. The results suggest that these methods generally produce unbiased estimates and good coverage when the model's distributional assumptions are satisfied, but severe misspecifications from non-normal distributions can introduce biases.
A growing body of literature has focused on missing data methods that factorize the joint distribution into a part representing the analysis model of interest and a part representing the distributions of the incomplete predictors. Relatively little is known about the utility of this method for multilevel models with interactive effects. This study presents a series of Monte Carlo computer simulations that investigates Bayesian and multiple imputation strategies based on factored regressions. When the model's distributional assumptions are satisfied, these methods generally produce nearly unbiased estimates and good coverage, with few exceptions. Severe misspecifications that arise from substantially non-normal distributions can introduce biased estimates and poor coverage. Follow-up simulations suggest that a Yeo-Johnson transformation can mitigate these biases. A real data example illustrates the methodology, and the paper suggests several avenues for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available