4.7 Article

OzDES Reverberation Mapping Program: Hβ lags from the 6-yr survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 520, Issue 2, Pages 2009-2023

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad145

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; quasars: emission lines; quasars: general; quasars: supermassive black holes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverberation mapping measures the relationship between the size of the broad-line region and luminosity of AGN. This study presents reverberation measurements using H beta from the OzDES program, successfully recovering reverberation lags for eight AGN at higher redshifts. The results are consistent with previous measurements and the observed dependence on accretion rate, providing a foundation for future research.
Reverberation mapping measurements have been used to constrain the relationship between the size of the broad-line region and luminosity of active galactic nuclei (AGN). This R-L relation is used to estimate single-epoch virial black hole masses, and has been proposed to use to standardize AGN to determine cosmological distances. We present reverberation measurements made with H beta from the 6-yr Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES) Reverberation Mapping Program. We successfully recover reverberation lags for eight AGN at 0.12 < z < 0.71, probing higher redshifts than the bulk of H beta measurements made to date. Our fit to the R-L relation has a slope of alpha = 0.41 +/- 0.03 and an intrinsic scatter of sigma = 0.23 +/- 0.02 dex. The results from our multi-object spectroscopic survey are consistent with previous measurements made by dedicated source-by-source campaigns, and with the observed dependence on accretion rate. Future surveys, including LSST, TiDES, and SDSS-V, which will be revisiting some of our observed fields, will be able to build on the results of our first-generation multi-object reverberation mapping survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available