4.7 Article

3D MHD models of the centrifugal magnetosphere from a massive star with an oblique dipole field

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 520, Issue 3, Pages 3947-3954

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad345

Keywords

MHD; stars: magnetic fields; stars: massive; stars: mass-loss; stars: winds; outflows

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new self-consistent 3D magnetohydrodynamics simulations to study the magnetospheres of massive stars with an oblique dipole magnetic axis. Our results show that the accumulation surfaces in the magnetospheres resemble the forms predicted by the analytical rigidly rotating magnetosphere model, but the mass buildup distorts the magnetic field and warps the accumulation surface towards the rotational equator. This study provides a tool to synthesize rotational modulation of photometric absorption and Hα emission for comparison with observations.
We present results from new self-consistent 3D magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of the magnetospheres from massive stars with a dipole magnetic axis that has a non-zero obliquity angle (beta) to the star's rotation axis. As an initial direct application, we compare the global structure of co-rotating discs for nearly aligned (beta = 5 degrees) versus half-oblique (beta = 45 degrees) models, both with moderately rapid rotation (similar to 0.5 critical). We find that accumulation surfaces broadly resemble the forms predicted by the analytical rigidly rotating magnetosphere model, but the mass buildup to near the critical level for centrifugal breakout against magnetic confinement distorts the field from the imposed initial dipole. This leads to an associated warping of the accumulation surface towards the rotational equator, with the highest density concentrated in wings centred on the intersection between the magnetic and rotational equators. These MHD models can be used to synthesize rotational modulation of photometric absorption and H alpha emission for a direct comparison with observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available