4.7 Article

Dynamics of stellar disc tilting from satellite mergers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 518, Issue 2, Pages 2870-2884

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3249

Keywords

Galaxy: disc; Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; dark matter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tilting of the Milky Way's stellar disc can be greatly influenced by infalling satellite galaxies and their tidal debris. This study uses N-body simulations to investigate the dynamics of disc tilting in a Milky Way-like host galaxy, considering satellite virial mass, initial position, and orbit as variables. The results suggest that the Galactic disc may still be tilting due to recent mergers, such as Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus, which has important implications for terrestrial direct detection experiments.
The Milky Way's stellar disc can tilt in response to torques that result from infalling satellite galaxies and their associated tidal debris. In this work, we explore the dynamics of disc tilting by running N-body simulations of mergers in an isolated, isotropic Milky Way-like host galaxy, varying over satellite virial mass, initial position, and orbit. We develop and validate a first-principles understanding of the dynamics that govern how the host galaxy's stellar disc responds to the satellite's dark matter (DM) debris. We find that the degree of disc tilting can be large for cosmologically motivated merger histories. In particular, our results suggest that the Galactic disc may still be tilting in response to Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus, one of the most significant recent mergers in the Milky Way's history. These findings have implications for terrestrial direct detection experiments as disc tilting changes the relative location of the Sun with respect to DM substructure left behind by a merging galaxy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available