4.7 Article

A search for dark matter among Fermi-LAT unidentified sources with systematic features in machine learning

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 520, Issue 1, Pages 1348-1361

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad066

Keywords

astroparticle physics - methods; data analysis - methods; observational - methods; statistical - dark matter - gamma-rays; general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Around one-third of the point-like sources in the Fermi-LAT catalogues remain unidentified, lacking a clear association with known astrophysical sources. This study proposes a new approach using machine learning to distinguish potential dark matter sources from astrophysical sources among the unidentified sources in the 4FGL Fermi-LAT catalogue. The best model, a neural network, achieved a classification accuracy of approximately 93.3% +/- 0.7%, but no dark matter source candidates were found in the pool of 4FGL Fermi-LAT unidentified sources.
Around one-third of the point-like sources in the Fermi-LAT catalogues remain as unidentified sources (unIDs) today. Indeed, these unIDs lack a clear, univocal association with a known astrophysical source. If dark matter (DM) is composed of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), there is the exciting possibility that some of these unIDs may actually be DM sources, emitting gamma-rays from WIMPs annihilation. We propose a new approach to solve the standard, machine learning (ML) binary classification problem of disentangling prospective DM sources (simulated data) from astrophysical sources (observed data) among the unIDs of the 4FGL Fermi-LAT catalogue. We artificially build two systematic features for the DM data which are originally inherent to observed data: the detection significance and the uncertainty on the spectral curvature. We do it by sampling from the observed population of unIDs, assuming that the DM distributions would, if any, follow the latter. We consider different ML models: Logistic Regression, Neural Network (NN), Naive Bayes, and Gaussian Process, out of which the best, in terms of classification accuracy, is the NN, achieving around 93 . 3 per cent +/- 0 . 7 per cent performance. Other ML evaluation parameters, such as the True Ne gativ e and True Positive rates, are discussed in our work. Applying the NN to the unIDs sample, we find that the de generac y between some astrophysical and DM sources can be partially solved within this methodology. None the less, we conclude that there are no DM source candidates among the pool of 4FGL Fermi-LAT unIDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available