4.6 Article

Chemical Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 3-Substituted Estrone/Estradiol Derivatives as 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Inhibitors Acting via a Reverse Orientation of the Natural Substrate Estrone

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020632

Keywords

steroid; chemical synthesis; inhibitor; 17 beta-HSD1; estrogen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estradiol (E2) is crucial in the development of diseases like breast cancer and endometriosis. Inhibiting the enzyme 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17 beta-HSD1), which is responsible for the production of E2, is a promising approach for treating these estrogen-dependent diseases. This study evaluated the impact of a m-carbamoylphenyloxy group on the efficacy of estrone (E1) and E2 derivatives as inhibitors of 17 beta-HSD1, and tested their activity on breast cancer and endometriosis cell lines.
Estradiol (E2) plays an important role in the progression of diseases such as breast cancer and endometriosis. Inhibition of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17 beta-HSD1), the enzyme that catalyzes the last step in the biosynthesis of the estrogenic hormone E2, therefore constitutes an interesting approach for the treatment of these two estrogen-dependent diseases. In order to obtain new inhibitors of 17 beta-HSD1, the impact of a m-carbamoylphenyloxy group at position three of an estrane nucleus was evaluated by preparing three derivatives of estrone (E1) and E2 using a microwave-assisted synthesis of diaryl ethers. Their inhibitory activity was addressed on two cell lines (T-47D and Z-12) representative of breast cancer and endometriosis, respectively, but unlike T-47D cells, Z-12 cells were not found suitable for testing potential 17 beta-HSD1 inhibitors. Thus, the addition of the m-carbamoylphenyl group at C3 of E1 (compound 5) did not increase the inhibition of E1 to E2 transformation by 17 beta-HSD1 present in T-47D cells (IC50 = 0.31 and 0.21 mu M for 5 and E1, respectively), and this negative effect was more obvious for E2 derivatives 6 and 10 (IC50 = 1.2 and 1.3 mu M, respectively). Molecular docking allowed us to identify key interactions with 17 beta-HSD1 and to highlight these new inhibitors' actions through an opposite orientation than natural enzyme substrate E1's classical one. Furthermore, molecular modeling experiments explain the better inhibitory activity of E1-ether derivative 5, as opposed to the E2-ether derivatives 6 and 10. Finally, when tested on T-47D and Z-12 cells, compounds 5, 6 and 10 did not stimulate the proliferation of these two estrogen-dependent cell lines. In fact, they reduced it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available