4.6 Review

Natural Agents as Novel Potential Source of Proteasome Inhibitors with Anti-Tumor Activity: Focus on Multiple Myeloma

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031438

Keywords

proteasome; natural compounds; proteasome inhibitors; multiple myeloma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an aggressive and incurable disease, characterized by cycles of treatment, remission, and relapse. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), such as Bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, have become the gold standard for MM treatment, improving survival outcomes. Recent research has focused on natural compounds that can inhibit the proteasome, potentially leading to new anti-MM drugs.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an aggressive and incurable disease for most patients, characterized by periods of treatment, remission and relapse. The introduction of new classes of drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs), has improved survival outcomes in these patient populations. The proteasome is the core of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), a complex and conserved pathway involved in the control of multiple cellular processes, including cell cycle control, transcription, DNA damage repair, protein quality control and antigen presentation. To date, PIs represent the gold standard for the treatment of MM. Bortezomib was the first PI approved by the FDA, followed by next generation of PIs, namely carfilzomib and ixazomib. Natural agents play an important role in anti-tumor drug discovery, and many of them have recently been reported to inhibit the proteasome, thus representing a new potential source of anti-MM drugs. Based on the pivotal biological role of the proteasome and on PIs' significance in the management of MM, in this review we aim to briefly summarize recent evidence on natural compounds capable of inhibiting the proteasome, thus triggering anti-MM activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available