4.6 Article

Enantioselective Recognition of Lysine and Phenylalanine Using an Imidazole Salt-Type Fluorescent Probe Based on H8-BINOL

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27238470

Keywords

H-8-BINOL; fluorescent probe; enantioselective recognition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Science Fund of the Technology Office of Jiangxi, China
  3. National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates
  4. [21462018]
  5. [21861025]
  6. [20192BAB203003]
  7. [202211318012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An imidazole bromide fluorescent probe (R)-1 based on chiral H-8-BINOL was synthesized, which showed good enantioselective recognition of lysine and phenylalanine using fluorescence analysis. The study explained the mechanisms of fluorescence enhancement and red shift, and demonstrated the ability of the probe to selectively recognize chiral amino acids.
An imidazole bromide fluorescent probe (R)-1 based on chiral H-8-BINOL was synthesized with a high yield; it was found to have good enantioselective recognition of lysine and phenylalanine using fluorescence analysis. When L-lysine was recognized, the enantioselective fluorescence enhancement ratio was 2.7 (ef = I-L - I-0/I-D - I-0, ef = 2.7, 20 eq Lys); as the amount of L-Lys increased, a distinct red shift was observed (the wavelength varied by 55.6 nm, 0-100 eq L-Lys), whereas D-Lys had a minimal red shift. The generation of this red shift phenomenon was probably due to the ICT effect; the probe's intramolecular charge transfer was affected after (R)-1 bound to L-Lys, and this charge transfer was enhanced, leading to a red shift in fluorescence. In addition to the enantioselective recognition of lysine, phenylalanine was also recognized; the enantioselective fluorescence enhancement ratio was 5.1 (ef = I-L - I-0/I-D - I-0, ef = 5.1, 20 eq Phe).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available