4.8 Article

Tuning Cytokine Receptor Signaling by Re-orienting Dimer Geometry with Surrogate Ligands

Journal

CELL
Volume 160, Issue 6, Pages 1196-1208

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BELSPO fellowship
  2. de Duve Institute Delori postdoctoral fellowship
  3. Training Program un Investigative Oncology [T32CA009287-35]
  4. Stanford CIRM Training Program [TG2-01159]
  5. NIH [U01HL099999]
  6. FRS-FNRS
  7. Salus Sanguinis Foundation
  8. Fondation contre le cancer (Belgium)
  9. Program IAP-BeMGI
  10. Program ARC
  11. Ludwig Institute
  12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  13. [NIH-RO1-AI51321]
  14. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1231073] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most cell-surface receptors for cytokines and growth factors signal as dimers, but it is unclear whether remodeling receptor dimer topology is a viable strategy to tune'' signaling output. We utilized diabodies (DA) as surrogate ligands in a prototypical dimeric receptor-ligand system, the cytokine Erythropoietin (EPO) and its receptor (EpoR), to dimerize EpoR ectodomains in non-native architectures. Diabody-induced signaling amplitudes varied from full to minimal agonism, and structures of these DA/EpoR complexes differed in EpoR dimer orientation and proximity. Diabodies also elicited biased or differential activation of signaling pathways and gene expression profiles compared to EPO. Non-signaling diabodies inhibited proliferation of erythroid precursors from patients with a myeloproliferative neoplasm due to a constitutively active JAK2V617F mutation. Thus, intracellular oncogenic mutations causing ligand-independent receptor activation can be counteracted by extracellular ligands that re-orient receptors into inactive dimer topologies. This approach has broad applications for tuning signaling output for many dimeric receptor systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available