4.6 Article

Cold Ethanol Extraction of Cannabinoids and Terpenes from Cannabis Using Response Surface Methodology: Optimization and Comparative Study

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27248780

Keywords

cannabis; cannabinoids; cold ethanol; delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; extraction

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient extraction of cannabinoids and terpenes from cannabis biomass using cold ethanol was optimized in this study. The optimal conditions for extraction at different temperatures were a cannabis-to-ethanol ratio of 1:15 and a 10 min extraction time. Terpene content decreased at -20 degrees C and room temperature compared to -40 degrees C extraction.
Efficient cannabis biomass extraction can increase yield while reducing costs and minimizing waste. Cold ethanol extraction was evaluated to maximize yield and concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes at different temperatures. Central composite rotatable design was used to optimize two independent factors: sample-to-solvent ratio (1:2.9 to 1:17.1) and extraction time (5.7 min-34.1 min). With response surface methodology, predicted optimal conditions at different extraction temperatures were a cannabis-to-ethanol ratio of 1:15 and a 10 min extraction time. With these conditions, yields (g 100 g dry matter(-1)) were 18.2, 19.7, and 18.5 for -20 degrees C, -40 degrees C and room temperature, respectively. Compared to the reference ground sample, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid changed from 17.9 (g 100 g dry matter(-1)) to 15, 17.5, and 18.3 with an extraction efficiency of 83.6%, 97.7%, 102.1% for -20 degrees C, -40 degrees C, and room temperature, respectively. Terpene content decreased by 54.1% and 32.2% for extraction at -20 degrees C and room temperature, respectively, compared to extraction at -40 degrees C. Principal component analysis showed that principal component 1 and principal component 2 account for 88% and 7.31% of total variance, respectively, although no significant differences in cold ethanol extraction at different temperatures were observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available