4.6 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of an Analgesic Potential Conotoxin Lv32.1

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27238617

Keywords

analgesic conotoxin; Lv32.1; Conus lividus; alpha 9 alpha 10 nAChR; Na(v)1.8 channel

Funding

  1. Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2019RC053]
  4. [81903492]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a peptide named Lv32.1 was screened from the conotoxin libraries and its folding conditions were optimized for efficient synthesis. The unique disulfide connectivity and analgesic potential of Lv32.1 were highlighted, providing a foundation for further development as an analgesic candidate.
In our work of screening analgesic peptides from the conotoxin libraries of diverse Conus species, we decoded a peptide sequence from Conus lividus and named it Lv32.1 (LvXXXIIA). The folding conditions of linear Lv32.1 on buffer, oxidizing agent, concentration of GSH/GSSG and reaction time were optimized for a maximum yield of (34.94 +/- 0.96)%, providing an efficient solution for the synthesis of Lv32.1. Its disulfide connectivity was identified to be 1-3, 2-6, 4-5, which was first reported for the conotoxins with cysteine framework XXXII and different from the common connectivities established for conotoxins with six cysteines. The analgesic effect of Lv32.1 was determined by a hot plate test in mice. An evident increase in the pain threshold with time illustrated that Lv32.1 exhibited analgesic potency. The effects on Na(v)1.8 channel and alpha 9 alpha 10 nAChR were detected, but weak inhibition was observed. In this work, we highlight the efficient synthesis, novel disulfide linkage and analgesic potential of Lv32.1, which laid a positive foundation for further development of conotoxin Lv32.1 as an analgesic candidate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available