4.4 Article

Spectrum of DDC variants causing aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency and pathogenicity interpretation using ACMG-AMP/ACGS recommendations

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages 359-381

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.11.003

Keywords

AADC; dopa decarboxylase; gene variant curation; locus -specific database; pathogenicity; neurotransmitter deficiency

Funding

  1. PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research aims to identify pathogenic DDC variants in AADC deficiency, classify and curate variants of unknown significance, and improve the diagnostic accuracy of genetic testing for this condition. By combining in silico variant interpretation tools, structural 3D modeling, and comparative analysis, the current interpretation recommendations for DDC variants have been enhanced.
Pathogenic variants in dopa decarboxylase (DDC), the gene encoding the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) enzyme, lead to a severe deficiency of neurotransmitters, resulting in neurological, neuromuscular, and behavioral manifestations clinically characterized by developmental delays, oculogyric crises, dystonia, and severe neurologic dysfunction in infancy. Historically, therapy has been aimed at compensating for neuro-transmitter abnormalities, but response to pharmacologic therapy varies, and in most cases, the therapy shows little or no benefit. A novel human DDC gene therapy was recently approved in the European Union that targets the underlying genetic cause of the disorder, providing a new treatment option for patients with AADC deficiency. However, the applicability of human DDC gene therapy depends on the ability of laboratories and clinicians to interpret the results of genetic testing accurately enough to diagnose the patient. An accurate inter-pretation of genetic variants depends in turn on expert-guided curation of locus-specific databases.The purpose of this research was to identify previously uncharacterized DDC variants that are of pathologic significance in AADC deficiency as well as characterize and curate variants of unknown significance (VUSs) to further advance the diagnostic accuracy of genetic testing for this condition.DDC variants were identified using existing databases and the literature. The pathogenicity of the variants was classified using modified American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathol-ogy/Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACMG-AMP/ACGS) criteria. To improve the current variant inter-pretation recommendations, in silico variant interpretation tools were combined with structural 3D modeling of protein variants and applied comparative analysis to predict the impact of the variant on protein function.A total of 422 variants were identified (http://biopku.org/home/pnddb.asp). Variants were identified on nearly all introns and exons of the DDC gene, as well as the 3 ' and 5 ' untranslated regions. The largest percentage of the identified variants (48%) were classified as missense variants. The molecular effects of these missense vari-ants were then predicted, and the pathogenicity of each was classified using a number of variant effect predictors. Using ACMG-AMP/ACGS criteria, 7% of variants were classified as pathogenic, 32% as likely pathogenic, 58% as VUSs of varying subclassifications, 1% as likely benign, and 1% as benign. For 101 out of 108 reported genotypes, at least one allele was classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. In silico variant pathogenicity interpretation tools, combined with structural 3D modeling of variant proteins and applied comparative analysis, have improved the current DDC variant interpretation recommendations, particu-larly of VUSs.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available