4.8 Article

Transcription factor antagonism regulates heterogeneity in embryonic stem cell states

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 82, Issue 23, Pages 4410-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.10.022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [F30 CA260739, P01 CA042063, K08 CA237856, P30-CA14051]
  2. NIGMS [T32 GM007753, GM144273]
  3. Koch Institute Charles W. and Jennifer C. Johnson Clinical Investigator Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterizes the regulatory program underlying heterogeneity in murine embryonic stem cell (mESC) states, showing that antagonism between factors at enhancers results in gene expression heterogeneity and formation of cell states. The results suggest that the regulation of enhancer binding can dampen variation in gene expression and alter the kinetics of switching between states.
Gene expression heterogeneity underlies cell states and contributes to developmental robustness. While heterogeneity can arise from stochastic transcriptional processes, the extent to which it is regulated is unclear. Here, we characterize the regulatory program underlying heterogeneity in murine embryonic stem cell (mESC) states. We identify differentially active and transcribed enhancers (DATEs) across states. DATEs regulate differentially expressed genes and are distinguished by co-binding of transcription factors Klf4 and Zfp281. In contrast to other factors that interact in a positive feedback network stabilizing mESC cell-type identity, Klf4 and Zfp281 drive opposing transcriptional and chromatin programs. Abrogation of factor binding to DATEs dampens variation in gene expression, and factor loss alters kinetics of switching between states. These results show antagonism between factors at enhancers results in gene expression heterogeneity and formation of cell states, with implications for the generation of diverse cell types during development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available