4.6 Article

Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study

Journal

MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100009

Keywords

breast cancer; interobserver agreement; HER2 low

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multicenter international study assessed the interobserver agreement in specific HER2 immunohistochemistry scores for breast cancer. The current guidelines may not be sufficient for identifying HER2-low tumors. Modifying the scoring criteria or adding fluorescent in situ hybridization may improve the agreement.
The classification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is optimized to detect HER2-amplified breast cancer (BC). However, novel HER2-targeting agents are also effective for BCs with low levels of HER2. This raises the question whether the current guidelines for HER2 testing are sufficiently reproducible to identify HER2-low BC. The aim of this multicenter interna-tional study was to assess the interobserver agreement of specific HER2 immunohistochemistry scores in cases with negative HER2 results (0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization negative) according to the current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the agreement improved by redefining immuno-histochemistry (IHC) scoring criteria or by adding fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).We conducted a 2-round study of 105 nonamplified BCs. During the first assessment, 16 pathol-ogists used the latest version of the ASCO/CAP guidelines. After a consensus meeting, the same pathologists scored the same digital slides using modified IHC scoring criteria based on the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines, and an extra ultralow category was added.Overall, the interobserver agreement was limited (4.7% of cases with 100% agreement) in the first round, but this was improved by clustering IHC categories. In the second round, the highest reproducibility was observed when comparing IHC 0 with the ultralow/1+/2+ grouped cluster

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available