4.7 Article

Selective production of light olefins over zeolite catalysts: Impacts of topology, acidity, and particle size

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112353

Keywords

Light olefins; Catalytic cracking; Naphtha; Methanol -to -olefins; Zeolite topology; Acidity; Particle size

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to conventional steam cracking, catalytic cracking of naphtha and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) over zeolite catalysts have been proven as the most successful processes for producing light olefins. In this review, the impacts of topology, acidity, and particle size of zeolites on the catalytic performance of naphtha cracking and MTO reactions, especially the light olefins selectivity and lifetime are systematically discussed. The goal is to provide a deeper understanding of the structure-property-performance relationship of various zeolite catalysts and facilitate the design of more excellent zeolite catalysts for these two processes.
Compared to conventional steam cracking, catalytic cracking of naphtha and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) over zeolite catalysts have been proved as the most successful processes for producing light olefins. To achieve the maximum light olefins yield and the longest lifetime, zeolite catalysts with excellent catalytic performance should be designed, by choosing suitable structure and regulating their physicochemical properties. In this re-view, the impacts of topology, acidity, and particle size of zeolites on the catalytic performance of naphtha cracking and MTO reactions, especially the light olefins selectivity and lifetime are systematically discussed. We hope that this review can be helpful not only to deeply understand the structure-property-performance rela-tionship of various zeolite catalysts, but also to design more excellent zeolite catalysts for these two processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available