4.7 Article

Triptycene based fluorinated polymers with improved carbon dioxide capture and hydrogen/methane storage

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 346, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112320

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of direct arylation polymerization (DArP) for obtaining porous organic polymers (POPs) has not been fully explored. In this study, three fluorinated porous organic polymers (fPOPs: TFPP1, TFPP2 and TFPP3) were synthesized using DArP, showing high thermal stability and surface area, making them suitable for capturing CO2 and storing CH4/H2.
The use of direct arylation polymerization (DArP) as a viable strategy to obtain porous organic polymers (POPs) has not been explored to its full potential. Instead, other strategies (such as conventional cross-coupling reactions) are usually employed to yield POPs that employ expensive organometallic monomers whose syn-theses require multiple steps. Herein, using DArP, three fluorinated porous organic polymers (fPOPs: TFPP1, TFPP2 and TFPP3) were obtained that represent unique examples of triptycene motif containing fluorine rich network polymers. These thermally stable polymers (Td > 400 ? with high char yields at 800 ?) are pre-dominantly microporous with high surface areas (up to 1295 m(2)/g) and thus satisfy the requirement for facilitating superior adsorption of small gas molecules. The recorded CO2, CH4, and H-2 uptake capacities of fPOPs are superior than several previously reported fluorinated/non-fluorinated POPs. High CO2 uptake capacities of fPOPs are due to the incorporation of ample triptycene motifs and polar C-F bonds in the polymeric backbone. Overall, the high thermal stability, surface area and sorption capacities demonstrated by these fluorinated polymers render them potential materials for the applications in capture of CO2 and storage of CH4/H-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available