4.7 Article

Automated electrochemical determination of beer total antioxidant capacity employing microdialysis online-coupled with amperometry

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107955

Keywords

Beer antioxidants; Antioxidant capacity; Polyphenols; HPLC; Electrochemical detection

Funding

  1. Palacky University
  2. [IGA_PrF_2022_023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, microdialysis coupled with amperometry was used for the analysis of beers, with electrode fouling effectively removed by electrode regeneration and sample cleanup. The method was found to be suitable for quantifying the antioxidant capacities of beers.
Electrochemical techniques are rarely applied for the evaluation of total antioxidant capacity of beers due to severe electrode inactivation (fouling) by adsorbed oxidation products of the species present in the samples. In this work, we show that microdialysis online-coupled with amperometry is suitable for beer analysis, permitting also an assay automation. The working electrode of the amperometric detector employs a carbon fiber micro -electrode that is regenerated between the analyses by short (1 sec) rapid (50 Hz) sinusoidal potential cycling between 0 and 2.9 V vs Ag/AgCl. This step, along with the sample cleanup by microdialysis effectively removes electrode fouling. The suitability of this approach for beer analysis was studied using eight different beers produced by international manufacturers. The results were compared with standard Kaneda diphenylpicrylhy-drazil (DPPH) assay. Steady state currents, obtained at 600 mV vs Ag/AgCl correlate well with the results ob-tained with Kaneda method and thus can be used for quantification of beers' antioxidant capacities. HPLC-ED of microdialysates with and without DPPH treatment were employed to get an insight into DPPH reactivity with beer components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available