4.6 Article

Patient-specific voxel-level dose prescription for prostate cancer radiotherapy considering tumor cell density and grade distribution

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 3746-3761

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16264

Keywords

dose redistribution; prostate cancer radiotherapy; TCP model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to develop a workflow for generating voxel-wise optimal dose prescriptions that maximize patient tumor control probability (TCP), and evaluate the feasibility and benefits of applying this workflow on a cohort of 62 prostate cancer patients. Results showed that biologically-optimized redistribution of a boost dose can yield TCP improvement relative to a uniform-boost dose distribution. Additionally, patient-specific tumor characteristics can be used to predict the likelihood of benefit from a redistribution approach for the individual patient.
BackgroundIn prostate radiation therapy, recent studies have indicated a benefit in increasing the dose to intraprostatic lesions (IPL) compared with standard whole gland radiation therapy. Such approaches typically aim to deliver a target dose to the IPL(s) with no deliberate effort to modulate the dose within the IPL. Prostate cancers demonstrate intra-tumor heterogeneity and hence it is hypothesized that further gains in the optimal delivery of radiation therapy can be achieved through modulation of the dose distribution within the tumor. To account for tumor heterogeneity, biologically targeted radiation therapy (BiRT) aims to utilize a voxel-wise approach to IPL dose prescription by incorporating knowledge of the spatial distribution of tumor characteristics. PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop a workflow for generating voxel-wise optimal dose prescriptions that maximize patient tumor control probability (TCP), and evaluate the feasibility and benefits of applying this workflow on a cohort of 62 prostate cancer patients. MethodThe source data for this proof-of-concept study included high resolution histology images annotated with tumor location and grade. Image processing techniques were used to compute voxel-level cell density distribution maps. An absolute tumor cell distribution was calculated via linearly scaling according to published estimated tumor cell numbers. For the IPLs of each patient, optimal dose prescriptions were obtained via three alternative methods for redistribution of IPL boost doses according to maximization of TCP. The radiosensitivity uncertainties were considered using a truncated log-normally distributed linear radiosensitivity parameter (alpha k${\alpha }_k$) and compared with Gleason pattern (GP) dependent radiosensitivity parameters that were derived based on previously published methods. An ensemble machine learning method was implemented to identify patient-specific features that predict the TCP improvement resulting from dose redistribution relative to a uniform dose distribution. ResultsThe Gleason pattern-dependent radiosensitivity parameters were calculated for 20 published prostate cancer alpha/beta${{\alpha}}/{{\beta}}$ ratios. Optimal voxel-level dose prescriptions were generated for all 62 PCa patients. For all dose redistribution scenarios, the optimal dose distribution always shows a higher (or equivalent) TCP level than the uniform dose distribution. The applied random forest regressor could predict patient-specific TCP improvement with low root mean square error (<= 1.5%) by using total tumor number, volume of IPLs and the standard deviation of tumor cell number among all voxels. ConclusionBiologically-optimized redistribution of a boost dose can yield TCP improvement relative to a uniform-boost dose distribution. Patient-specific tumor characteristics can be used to predict the likelihood of benefit from a redistribution approach for the individual patient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available