4.7 Article

Deep learning for computational cytology: A survey

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102691

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Computational cytology; Pathology; Cancer screening; Survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational cytology is a critical and rapidly developing topic in medical image computing. Deep learning approaches have achieved significant advancements in cytology image analysis, leading to a substantial increase in publications. This article surveys over 120 publications on deep learning-based cytology image analysis, investigating advanced methods and comprehensive applications. It introduces different deep learning schemes, summarizes public datasets, evaluation metrics, and versatile applications, and discusses current challenges and potential research directions in computational cytology.
Computational cytology is a critical, rapid-developing, yet challenging topic in medical image computing concerned with analyzing digitized cytology images by computer-aided technologies for cancer screening. Recently, an increasing number of deep learning (DL) approaches have made significant achievements in medical image analysis, leading to boosting publications of cytological studies. In this article, we survey more than 120 publications of DL-based cytology image analysis to investigate the advanced methods and comprehensive applications. We first introduce various deep learning schemes, including fully supervised, weakly supervised, unsupervised, and transfer learning. Then, we systematically summarize public datasets, evaluation metrics, versatile cytology image analysis applications including cell classification, slide-level cancer screening, nuclei or cell detection and segmentation. Finally, we discuss current challenges and potential research directions of computational cytology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available