4.4 Article

A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Economics

Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Discrete-Choice Experiments: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report

Caroline Vass et al.

Summary: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are widely used to understand preferences in health and healthcare. This study surveyed health preference researchers and nonhealth method experts to explore the state of practice in accounting for preference heterogeneity in DCE analysis. It found that while most respondents agreed on the importance of accounting for heterogeneity, there were disagreements and a need for additional guidance. A systematic review of DCE literature in health revealed that mixed logit with continuous distributions and latent class models were commonly used analytical methods.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Economics

Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?

Samare P. Huls et al.

Summary: This study compared the best-worst, best-best, and ranking discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to determine the most suitable method for moving beyond traditional single-best DCEs. The results showed that preferences varied between elicitation methods and between first and second choices. Best-worst DCE had good choice consistency and statistical efficiency for first choices, but performed worse for second choices. Ranking had the best performance in terms of respondent-reported difficulty and preference, while best-best had better statistical efficiency for second choices. All three methods improved data collection efficiency compared to using only first choices. However, the differences in preferences between first and second choices hindered the transition to single-best DCE. If such transition is necessary, best-best and ranking are preferred over best-worst DCE.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2022)

Article Economics

Examining ordering effects and strategic behaviour in a discrete choice experiment

Thanh Cong Nguyen et al.

Summary: This study explores ordering effects in a discrete choice experiment surveying preference for improvements in cyclone warning services. The results suggest that preferences of possibly strategic respondents are relatively unstable over a sequence of six choice tasks, with strategic behavior potentially causing position-dependent ordering effects.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY (2021)

Article Economics

Stated versus revealed preferences: An approach to reduce bias

Kaat de Corte et al.

Summary: By combining large-scale routine data with SP survey responses, this study aims to more accurately predict actual behavioral preferences and reduce hypothetical bias. Through an experimental design that contrasts pilot SP survey responses with data on RPs, the study estimates hypothetical bias and improves the accuracy of survey design.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?

E. W. de Bekker-Grob et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2020)

Review Economics

Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future

Vikas Soekhai et al.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer

Caroline M. Vass et al.

PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2018)

Article Economics

Correlation and scale in mixed logit models

Stephane Hess et al.

JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING (2017)

Article Economics

Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature

Esther W. de Bekker-Grob et al.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2012)

Article Economics

A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches

Richard T. Carson et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2011)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm

Richard Williams

STATA JOURNAL (2010)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments

Emily Lancsar et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2007)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables

Richard Williams

STATA JOURNAL (2006)

Article Economics

Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics

F Carlsson et al.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2003)

Review Economics

Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence

RT Carson et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2001)